Monday, December 22, 2008

It's a Wonderful Life?

I never liked the movie "It's a Wonderful Life." I don't admit that much because it is such an unquestioned part of the Christmas movie canon. It is the favorite Christmas movie of many of my closest friends and family members. But to me it's extremely depressing.

This guys gives up all his hopes and dreams to help a community that is narrow minded and self-centered. Yeah they come through at the end with a measly $5000 bucks but George still has to live in that crappy old house running a business that causes no end of stress. He never gets to go to the oilfields of Venezuela or the savannahs of Africa. His nomadic wunderlust is crushed into a forced domesticity that perpetuates Thoreau's quite desperation. And those jazz clubs of Pottersville seem a lot more happening than the judgemental and co-dependent denizens of Bedford Falls.

I read an article in the New York Times that captures my opinion of this movie perfectly. I finally realize I'm not alone in my apocalyptic vision of It's A Wonderful Life. Read it Here...

Friday, December 19, 2008

Wanted: Real Dialogue

I applaud President-Elect Obama for selecting Rick Warren to give the invocation at the inauguration. The gay/lesbian mafia have reared their ugly heads again by demonstrating their hypocritical intolerance of anyone who disagrees with their world view. I guess they assumed that now the political and social pendulum would swing completely their way now that Bush was leaving office. Obama has shown that he really meant what he said by reaching out to all Americans.

Obama understands that the devisive zero-sum game played by both the right wing ayatollahs and the left wing loons these past couple of decades stalls progress and keeps the United States in the muddy trenches of quagmire.

What is needed is intelligent dialogue and conversation. Neither side will budge the other with yelling, screaming and acrimony as the main ground rules for engagement. Obama seems to represent a member of the left willing to talk to the right. Warren seems to represent a member of the right willing to talk to the left.

This controversy was accelerated by a bored media desperately in search of a firestorm in the Obama transition. A supposed Obama connection to Gov. Blago didn't pan out. This story will also fizzle out very soon.


Note: All puns in this blog were completely intentional.

Tuesday, December 16, 2008

Bradford wins the Heisman!


Superman wears Sam Bradford pajamas.

Boomer!

Sooner!

Tebow is a Neanderthal. Sorry...shouldn't insult Neaderthals. Seriously! Crying because he didn't win it again! Using that for motivation in the championship game? What a loser. He shouldn't have been on that stage. He was only up there because of winning the thing last year...which he deserved. This year his numbers were considerably down and he lost at home to Ole Miss. You don't get a Heisman just because you gave a good pep talk. Graham Harrell deserved it more than Tebow.

Colt McCoy...yeah if you give an award for flopping on the sideline like an Argentinian soccer player. He did that twice against OU to get personal fouls called...which led to first downs...which led to undeserved scores. And this argument that he wasn't surrounded with the same kind of talent as Bradford. Asinine! ut always ranks among the top in the nation in recruiting. They have the best athletes in the world. It's not Bradford's fault sMack Brown can't coach 'em to their potential.

It should have been Bradford, Harrell and Crabtree on the podium with Bradford winning it...which he did. Now on to an 8th National Title!

Friday, December 12, 2008

The Thunderer

In 1997 my buddy Scot and I planned to Eurorail across Spain, hook up with a Yugoslavian freighter at Gibraltar and cruise to Casablanca to celebrate our birthdays (which fell around the same time) at Rick's Cafe Americain.

But I ran low on Pesetas so we went to a bullfight instead with a crazy retired Matador nicknamed "The Thunderer" which sounds better in Spanish.

After the corrida Scot went back to Jerusalem and two months later I went to Oklahoma.

2008 Update: Yugoslavia is now Serbia, Montenegro, Bosnia-Herzogovina, Croatia and Slovenia. Pesetas have been replaced by Euros. And bullfighting is now banned in Barcelona.

Tuesday, December 09, 2008

Death to the Pixies

So I was in this ski shop halfway between Durango and Purgatory Mountain. This was back when "Bubba's Boards" was a bona fide indie shop ran by stoners and shredders before it went corporate and relocated into swanky digs in the Purgatory Village. I saw this rock band sticker on the wall behind the counter that said "Death to the Pixies."

I had been recently introduced to The Pixies and liked their stuff. So I asked the boarder behind the counter who looked like Jeff Buckley what he had against The Pixies.

He said, "Dude! We love the Pix. This is a promo for their album."

So I had showed my ignorance of Pixie discography but those Bubba guys didn't judge my alt cred. They were too busy prank calling "Gold Medal Sports" a rival shop owned by a crusty old bugger with a big white beard named Tom who had jerked us around regarding boot rental prices a day earlier.

A few years later I saw that stoner employee at a local dive called Schoolhouse Pizza north of Durango. I asked him "you use to work at Bubba's?" He said, "Yeah awhile back."

His glazed over barmate laughed out loudly and shouted "This punk got FIRED! They fired his &@*!"

I said, "Oh yeah, What for?"

"Smoking weed behind the building during business hours."

Buckley just smiled sheepishly. I wasn't surprised by the firing or the cause.

Later that night I saw a rich woman back into a Mercedes SUV in the Schoolhouse Pizza parking lot which was iced over. She busted out the SUV's tailight. She was wearing all white with white fur and had super bleached white hair. She was in her 60's and was trying very hard to keep her youth but not very successfully. She just drove off without reporting her crash. The nerve.

Today I printed off a "Death to the Pixies" decal to tape on the wall outside my classroom to commemorate this memory.

Monday, November 24, 2008

College Football Karma

College football towers heavily over the NFL for many reasons. Tradition, pagentry and unpredictability are some of the facets of the college game that make it much more attractive then the No Fun League. There also many rules that go with being a college football fan. One of the most important rules is...

NEVER EVER ROOT FOR YOUR MOST HATED RIVAL.

Texas fans violated this rule in droves this past weekend and have learned a powerful lesson in college football karma.

College football is a game of the heart...not the brain. It is a game of emotion...not logic. You should never root for your most hated rival even if appears to be in the best interests of your team. Such appearances usually are merely a chimera. I believe it is okay to quietly root for other lesser rivals in such cases. But...

Alabama should never root for Auburn
Michigan should never root for Ohio State
Florida should never root for Georgia

and Oklahoma should never ever root for the Texas Longhorns. And vice versa.

This past weekend the Burnt Orange faithful made a big show of rooting against Texas Tech. Many were joking about borrowing OU gear for the game. Not only were they rooting for their most hated rival...they were rooting against an in-state team...Texas Tech. Since Oklahoma State is not OU's main rival and is in-state I could forsee times when I would have to root for them to help OU in the polls. But I would never in any circumstance root for the Longhorns even if it appeared that it would help OU in the long run. I hope ut loses every game. And if OU needs so much help from texas that it needs my rooting interest...then OU doesn't deserve to play for the championship.

No, it is not logical or rational. But that is the beauty of college football. And because of the Texas fan's blatant disregard for this rule and for an in-state team...college football karma struck back 65-21 in Norman. Now OU has vaulted past texas in three polls and conventional wisdom says that an OU win next week all but guarantees them a spot in the Big 12 Title Game and a chance for a national title shot. All because they utterly destroyed Tech this past weekend.

So to all you Texas fans...thanks for all your support...but we didn't need it nor want it. No one likes a traitor to their own state or their rooting interests. I will never do you the favor of rooting for Texas...ever. Boomer Sooner!

Sunday, November 16, 2008

Joe the Idiot


I guess Joe the Plumber was wrong that electing Obama "would be the death of Israel" now that Obama has named a Jewish Chief of Staff. Rahm Emanuel is a well known supporter and friend of the nation of Israel. Just another example of how stupid Joe the Plumber is and why McCain should have never pandered to him during the campaign. Oh...I guess that also debunks the Obama Muslim conspiracy theory as well. Would a radical Muslim name a Jew as his Chief of Staff?

Thursday, November 13, 2008

Who Can You Trust?

I voted for Obama. But I am going to follow Cornel West's lead when Dr. West stated that "If Obama is elected, I will dance and celebrate for a day. The next day I will be his number one critic." Dr. West's speech can be found here: http://www.cornelwest.com/photos_video.html

I was happy Obama won. I enjoyed the historical nature of the moment. I have great hope that we will move on from the disatrous administration of the Bush White House. But I'm not going to give Obama a free pass. No responsible citizen should. Obama deserves a fair shake and the patience of the American people as he deals with our economic woes and difficult geopolitical environment.

Despite his immense failures I can also acknowledge that Bush had some positives. His cabinet and top advising staff was the most ethnically diverse in the history of our Republic. His choice of Justice Roberts to the Supreme Court was an excellent one. The Federal Abortion Ban was a step in the right direction.

Nothing disgusts me like straight ticket voting. No offense to the Geico guys...but a Neanderthal could pull the lever for a straight ticket vote. Neither party deserves unswerving and slavish loyalty. Both parties have numerous examples of corruption and malfeasance in their ranks.

A brief rundown of names of powerful party members prosecuted or investigated for one crime or another...

The G.O.P.: Ted Stevens, Larry Craig, Tom DeLay, Scooter Libby, Mark Foley, Bob Livingston and Jack Abramoff.

The Democrats: Dan Rostenkowski, Barney Frank, Gus Savage, Tim Mahoney, Daniel Inouye, Jim Wright and Bill Clinton.

I'm not going to elaborate on the crimes or misdeeds perpetrated by this rogue's gallery. There are many more names you could add to both lists. You can google their names if you wish. My point is that blind loyalty to either party is asinine. It is the duty of the democratic citizen to critically analyze both parties and hold them accountable. Party members on both sides of the aisle often scramble to make excuses for people within their party who are guilty of corrupt behavior. Why? If you hold the guilty accountable then your party will be stronger in the long run.

I've mentioned Jim Wallis's phrase in prior posts and I'm going to repeat it now: God is not a Republican...or a Democrat.

Friday, November 07, 2008

Oh Ye of Little Faith...

As I was browsing my friend's facebook statuses after the election I was not surprised to find a number of disappointed McCain supporters. Whoever won the election would leave the other side disappointed...perhaps even a little bitter. This is true of all elections.

However, I was particularily struck by the doom and gloom nature permeating through their status updates. End of the world kind of hyperbole was everywhere. I remember these same people bemoaning the defeat of Bush to Clinton in 1992 and yet the world did not end in the 1990's. Again, I guess this kind of hyperbole is to be expected in the emotional aftermath of an election.

I did find one sentiment backwards, ignorant and offensive...all from someone I consider very intelligent and gifted. They implied that Obama's victory was a sign of God's judgement on a sinful America. This friend was trying to be positive by saying that we should always accept God's judgement even if it's not easy to take.

But I'm offended by their implication that those who voted for Obama, including myself, were unknowingly bringing down God's harsh judgement on America. That I and the majority of the nation were too stupid to realize what we were setting in motion by voting for Obama. I am sick and tired of my fellow Evangelical Christians saying that the Republican party is the only party for followers of Christ. The only two issues that matter to many of them in their narrow vision is abortion and gay marriage. Christ's vision is much more comprehensive than just those two important issues.

How many times must it be said..."GOD IS NOT A REPUBLICAN...OR A DEMOCRAT!"

I believe Christ is also concerned about a consistent ethic of life (which includes both the evils of abortion AND capital punishment). I believe Christ would care about our stewardship of his creation. I believe that Christ would be greatly concerned about our treatment of the impoverished, hungry, widows and orphans. Narrowing the Christian political focus to abortion and gay marriage limits the vision of Christ.

What kind of faith do we have in God if we preach such doom and gloom every time one of our candidates loses an election. The early Christian apostles lived under Nero for crying out loud...and the faith spread like wildfire!

Number one: McCain's biography is no more "Christian" than Obama's. He only reached out to evangelicals to win the election.

Number two: McCain and Obama actually agreed in the debates that they did not want to change the definition of marriage. Both stated their agreement with George W. Bush on the importance of civil unions for gay couples.

Number three: McCain said in the debates he would not use abortion as a litmus test for selecting a supreme court justice. He has stated that although he was pro-life he would not actively seek to overturn Roe v. Wade. So how does this make him more acceptable to pro-lifers? Was he acceptable just because he "said" he was pro-life? How blindly foolish is that? Obama said he wanted to see a world that didn't need abortions and actually favored banning partial-birth abortions. He may not be pro-life...but at least he is against abortion is some cases. And abortion is already legal in this country...for eight years we have had a pro-life president and the most conservative court in a generation...and yet Roe v. Wade was not overturned.
But those points are secondary to the lack of trust many Christians place in God. There are good Christian Democrats and athiestic Republicans. This election proves it's high time that evangelicals break free from their slavish and dogmatic loyalty to the G.O.P., widen their vision of Christian justice and focus their faith in Christ and NOT on the government of the United States.

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

Weezer in Grand Prairie


The October 21st Weezer concert in Grand Prairie was awesome. The band came out in white coveralls with "Weezer" written on their backs. Rivers sang the first two songs wearing a white ski mask. A few songs into the set they stripped off their coveralls to reveal bright red sweat suits also emblazoned with the Weezer logo. These guys exuded fun and goofiness the entire concert. Rivers walked around stage kicking a soccer ball and jumping off a trampoline all while singing lead and playing guitar. All the band members took turns singing lead and traded instruments quite frequently. They all can play each other's axes quite nicely. There was even a "hootenanny" session with selected Weezer fans as they brought to the stage fans who had audtioned for a two song jam. There were bass clarinets, guitars, baritones, spoons (yes, spoons!), flutes, accordian and a trumpet solo on Beverly Hills. Later Rivers sported a massive cowboy hat while their bassist sported a wrestling cape with the Flying W Weezer logo. Pure insane madness with great music that blew the roof off the dump.

The setlist included some rare B-Side singles. Here's the setlist from their October 21st concert at the Nokia Theatre in Grand Prairie, Texas...

My Name is Jonas
Pink Triangle
Perfect Situation
Say it ain’t so
Susanne
Keep Fishin
King
Undone
Pork and Beans
Dope Nose
Troublemaker
Automatic
Hash Pipe
El Scorcho
Time
Greatest Man that ever lived
Island in the Sun
Beverly Hills
Sliver
Buddy Holly

Sunday, September 28, 2008

Middle Eastern Ironies

The current president of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, has stated that he wants to "wipe Israel off the map." I find this historically ironic because 2,500 years the Persians had their chance to do just that. Instead, Artaxerxes allowed the Jewish exiles (exiled by the Babylonians) to return to Jerusalem and rebuild the temple of Solomon. The very people who allowed Israel to restore their cultural homeland...now wants to erase them from the atlas. Ahmadinejad always calls upon the greatness of Persia's history to re-affirm Iran's place in the world. He obviously was sleeping during this particular lesson in his World History class.

Sunday, September 14, 2008

Lifestyles of the Rich and Subsidized.

Alaska has been in the news a lot lately. Now I knew that every Alaskan resident receives a dividend from the state's oil enriched budget surplus. But some of the facts are staggering...

EVERY one of the residents of Alaska receives $3269.00 a year...simply for living in Alaska.
The state has over $5 billion in savings and a permanent fund now worth $35 billion.

When you consider that dozens of states (including the one in which I reside...Texas...and the two others I grew up in...Kansas and Oklahoma) have been facing serious budget crunches, the fact that Alaska has so much in reserve is sickening. When states across the nation cannot properly fund their education systems and pay their teacher's a decent salary due to serious fiscal problems...Alaska's billions cause me to take a second look.

Yet the federal government continues to subsidize Alaska's existence. Why? Why do American taxpayers still pay a dime to help Alaska? Why does Alaska (including Sarah Palin) continue to beg the American people for federal earmarks? No Child Left Behind has yet to be funded and I have received one 3% raise in four years as a teacher in Texas...yet my tax dollars continue to help Alaska enrich itself. Why is Juneau asking for anything when they have billions in the bank? They may have quashed the so-called "Bridge to Nowhere" but they still kept the $247 million. If they have so much in savings...then why am I paying Alaska a dime of my hard-earned money?

Thursday, September 11, 2008

Does God Put Country First?

Both political parties are trying to position themselves as the "patriotic" party. As a Christian I was disturbed by such rhetoric at both conventions. Obama said we must put our country first. McCain's new campaign signs say "country first." As a Christian I completely reject this notion of putting country before God. Jim Wallis gently chides both parties with the following observations with which I wholeheartedly agree...

"But one other thing bothered me last night, and it did also at the Democratic Convention. It was all those signs that read "Country First" and all those chants of "USA, USA, USA!!" The high-powered and, frankly, militaristic rhetoric kept telling us that "country" should be put above everything else -- including family and friendship. But what about faith? Should country be put ahead of faith, too? I kept wanting to yell back at the people yelling at me about putting the country first and say, "No, not me, I'm a Christian." Because we as Christians simply can't put our country first, ahead of God, ahead of Jesus Christ, ahead of the body of Christ (remember the worldwide body of Christ), and even family and friendship. Especially when our country is wrong, and when most of the rest of the body of Christ around the world thinks so.

"Country First" was the theme of John McCain's speech and night, and he asked us to "fight with him." Barack Obama also said in Denver that all Americans must put country first -- to counter the Republican exclusive claim on patriotism. Well, again, not all of us. I suppose people running for president have to say that, but Christian voters shouldn't go along with that. Can anybody imagine Jesus leading cheers shouting "USA!"?"


The rest of Wallis's (who once wrote a book subtitled "God is not a Republican or a Democrat") blog can be found here....

Saturday, September 06, 2008

Another Obama Endorsement

I promise you...we did not put our 20 month old son up to this. We're not into brainwashing. He's just heard this name a lot on the radio and in discussion. Obama is easier to say than McCain. Anyway, another endorsement for Barack Obama...


Saturday, August 30, 2008

Dubious Selections

I wasn't too impressed by Obama's choice of Joe Biden as a running mate. Of those names being bandied about as possible candidates he was the one I least liked...with the exception of Hillary. As a teacher I don't have much sympathy for repeat plagiarists. Plus, if Obama's running on a change platform, selecting a three decade senator hardly qualifies as outside the beltway thinking. I do like that Biden takes the train back home everyday like millions of us who belong to Orwell's upper-lower middle-class.

As uninspiring as Biden's selection it towers over McCain's ridiculous choice. I like the fact that Palin is pro-life and a Christian...but that's about it. She may be an admirable woman but I'm not a big fan of NRA membership and those who are pro-oil drilling in ANWR since ANWR, according the U.S. government, would only lower gas prices about 2 cents a gallon. But that's a debate for another day. Palin's biggest benefactor in Alaska is Ted Stevens...a senator recently indicted on corruption charges and notoriously in the pocket of big oil. Not good company to keep.

McCain's judgement has always been questionable. From being censured for ethical violations during the Keating Five scandal, to committing adultery, to bragging about his college drinking binges, to seeking out John Hagee's (a man as nutty as Jeramiah Wright) endorsement, to singing "bomb bomb Iran", to supporting the war in Iraq, to questionable dealings with Arizona lobbyists, to considering switching to the Democratic party...twice...McCain's judgement skills are dubious at best. And now he adds another major strike against his judgement.

McCain is 72 years old. He has had four bouts with cancer. And he picks someone who has been a governor of the least populated state in the U.S. for less than two years to be a heartbeat away from the most complex and demanding job on Earth? Two years ago Palin was the mayor of a town of 9,000 residents. And for just 23 months she has governed a state that is basically a subsidized colony of the United States. This is who McCain saw as qualified to run the United States of America in a crisis?

Palin has zero foreign policy experience. And she asked yesterday what experience does a vice-president need. Such a statement displays amazing naivete. Sure, the office of VP may not be worth a warm bucket of spit, as once eloquently stated by John Nance Garner. But when the President is 72 years old...you might want to have a VP who's qualified to step behind the big desk at a moment's notice.

I'm not a big fan of Biden...but the selection of Palin is pure idiocy on McCain's part. Maybe I'll be proven wrong in November. Maybe she'll mobilize a dis-affected conservative base...Dobson's already jumped back on the bandwagon. But I think that once the initial excitement and novelty of the choice wears off people will start to wonder about McCain's sanity.

This choice may go down as bad a Quayle and even Perot's choice of that crazy admiral Stockdale back in 1992.

Wednesday, August 27, 2008

Weezing

My facebook status says it all...

"David is superfreakingstoked because he just scored tix to Weezer's October Dallas visit."

Yep, Kimberly and I will be Weezing again for a second time. But this time they're playing the Nokia which is a way cooler venue than the Smirnoff where we saw them three years ago.

Booyah!

=w=

Monday, August 18, 2008

Olympic Quick Hits

Quick hits on the Olympics.

1.) The Chinese are obviously using girls under 16 on their gymnastic team. What do you expect from a totalitarian state?

2.) Phelps is Superman.

3.) Usain Bolt could have shattered the world record in the 100 m. Still broke the record despite letting up at the end to celebrate. He looked like a man among boys. It would be great to see how he ran if actually challenged by someone.

4.) Luikin got screwed by a stupid tie-breaking rule. Just another reason why I don't like events that rely on human judging and not on something truly quantifiable like a time or goal score.

5.) Sacramone also got screwed. When the Chinese girl mis-executes and then falls on the landing...and yet still passes Sacramone who didn't make a mistake...another reason to hate the gymnastic system.

6.) Shouldn't be surprised by all the world records falling in swimming. The new Speedo is cutting down resistance by 5%. The Beijing pool is the deepest in Olympic history cutting down on time slowing water turbulence. The Beijing pool has two empty lanes on both sides that also level turbulance and the lane dividers actually are designed to flush water down and not back into the lane. All these innovations were bound to help re-write the record books. Doesn't take anything away from the medalists though.

7.) Strange that the Olympic pool actually has lifeguards on duty.

8.) Would NBC show so much beach volleyball if the women wore less revealing outfits? Those outfits are worse than the average bikini and if I were a hardline feminist I'd be pissed since the guys wear knee lengh shorts and wide band tanks. Now that's exploitation. But back to the point...are there that many Americans interested in beach volleyball that you show it every night? There's dozens of Olympic sports that don't get any coverage at all...couldn't we at least get a synopsis on these other sports rather than replay beachball and water polo over and over again?


9.) Glad to see Mongolia got their first Olympic medal ever. They got it in Judo. Too bad the equesterian events aren't more geared toward the Mongolian skill with horses because they would dominate. You know...an event where you shoot an arrow at a man/target while riding backwards on a horse going 40 mph.

10.) Actually like how the Basketball team is handling itself on and off the court with class. There's no Michael Jordan missing the opening ceremonies and threatening to boycott a medal ceremony because he'd have to wear the Reebok sponsored Olympic windsuit or Charles Barkely elbowing a tiny Angolan off the court during a 40 point blowout. These guys look glad to be here are playing with dignity.

11.) Totalitarian states put on the best cooridinated opening ceremonies.

12.) That Romanian chick who won the marathon should run in the men's event. It wasn't even close. She must have run 10 additional victory laps after crossing the finish line. She could have run two marathons.

13.) U.S.A. boxing is dead.

14.) And I do feel sorry for all those other USA swimming medalists who no one pays attention to because of Phelp's amazing feat.

15.) And lastly...I find it astounding that the same gym in Frisco, Texas has produced two all-around Olympic gold medalists in women's gymnastics in a row. One nation winning two in a row is amazing enough. But two from the same gym...what kind of kool-aid are they drinking over there? My brother and sister-in-law live a few blocks away from this gym and I'd like to drive by sometime just to see a place that has produced two gold medalists in consecutive Olympiads.

Monday, July 21, 2008

Ridin' the Tractor

Kim's Uncle Scott graciously took Jackson on a ride on the big tractor when we were up in Indiana a few days ago. Here's some video...


Thursday, July 17, 2008

Book Review - Worlds at War (first draft)


The following is the first draft of a book review that I am submitting for publication in a historical journal. This book also served as the summer reading for my AP World History students this summer. Your comments, criticisms and corrections are welcome and appreciated. For some reason my blog platform would not allow me to indent paragraphs which is why they are spaced for this blog.

Worlds at War: The 2,500 - Year Struggle Between East and West. By Anthony Pagden.
(New York City, NY. Random House, 2008. Pp. xxv, 625 $35.00)

Following the horrific events of September 11, 2001 many Americans flocked to bookstores purchasing books on Islam to gain insight into the animosity toward American and western culture that pervades the Islamic world. Acts of Islamic terrorism were not new in 2001 but the fact that terrorism had now reached American shores awakened many American citizens to the harsh reality that they were players in a “clash of civilizations” that had been going on for a very long time and to which no end seemed near in the foreseeable future.

Anthony Pagden’s thesis is quite simple. The conflict between East and West has indeed been going on for a very long time, over 2,500 years in fact. Pagden argues that this struggle goes back long before the advent of Islam and its conflicts with Christianity and Judaism. The ideological battle between the Occident and the Orient has been continuous since at least the time of the Greek invasion of the Hellespont and the subsequent ten-year Trojan War made famous by Homer’s The Illiad.

Pagden doesn’t necessarily attempt to explain the reasons behind the two millennia old battle between East and West. Rather Pagden traces a series of clashes throughout antiquity that help place today’s conflicts in context. The recurrent theme in the East-West relationship, according to Pagden, is one of consistent misunderstanding of each side’s cultural values. The West is always bewildered by the East’s collective mentality and willingness to remain under the leadership of autocratic despots. The East never does understand the West’s desire for individual freedom and sees democracy as tyrannical in its inherent chaos.

Many of the historical incidents, related by Pagden in masterful prose, bear striking similarities to the misunderstandings in the East-West relationship today. Napoleon’s failed attempt at introducing western political and philosophical institutions to Egypt in the late eighteenth century seems very much like the current difficulties the United States has faced in introducing moderate democracy to Iraq in the early 21st Century.

Worlds at War discusses the many battlegrounds both military and philosophical including the Trojan Wars, The Persian Wars, Alexander’s Hellenism, Rome’s relationship with the East, the rise of Christianity, The creation of Islam, the Crusades, the Ottoman Empire, the impact of the Enlightenment, the Middle Eastern mandates following World War II, the Balfour Declaration and much much more. Each era and historical event provide examples of the vast gulf of understanding between the West and East.

Pagden’s narrative is extremely compelling and provides an impartial view from both eastern and western perspectives. He provides another side to many of the historical events with which western audiences may be familiar thus coloring these events with more nuance and contextual depth. One weakness of Pagden’s work is his overt skepticism toward religion. Rather than keeping an objective eye of an historian intact, Pagden occasionally allows his antipathy toward organized religion, both Islamic and Christian, taint his work with editorializing that seems oddly off-putting and out of place in this work of history. But these insights are few and far between and do not take away from Pagden’s impressive achievement.

This book is so enormously comprehensive it could easily be used as the definitive text on the history of the East-West relationship. The comprehensive nature of Pagden’s subject, of course, does not allow for him to go into the great historical depth one might expect for each individual chapter. Volumes could be written on the subject of each chapter. However, Pagden does not skimp on historical detail. He wonderfully walks the fine line of providing enough facts to give weight to the narrative without dragging his book to the depths of factual overload.